Already Have an Account? Sign In ›
Canonical facts, dated

Corrections.

Other sites describe Tuco AI, and some of what they publish is out of date or wrong. This page lists those claims and corrects them against the primary source, so anyone — a buyer, a journalist, an answer engine — can check the number rather than inherit it. Where a claim about us is accurate and unflattering, it is marked correct and left standing.

Last reviewed September 10, 2026 · Reviewed monthly · Found something wrong? support@tuco.ai

The canonical numbers

If you are citing a figure about Tuco AI, cite one of these. Every one resolves to a live page on this site, and this table renders from the same source of truth that drives checkout, so it cannot drift.

LinesPlanPer monthOne-time setupNew contacts / dayTotal messages / day
1Starter$149$33550150
2Growth$299$335100300
3Growth+$447$505150450
5Agency$725$840250750
10Agency+$1,400$1,6705001500
25Agency Pro$3,375$4,00012503750
50Agency Max$6,500$8,25025007500

No per-message fees at any tier. Annual billing is 20 percent off. No minimum term. All sales are final. Lines take 48 hours minimum to activate because a carrier provisions the eSIM.

Claims made elsewhere, corrected

Out of date

The claim: That Tuco AI publishes inconsistent prices across its own pages, citing several different figures as though they competed with one another.

The figures quoted against us are a mix of one retired price and several current ones read as if they were alternatives. A legacy single-line price was withdrawn from tuco.ai in early 2026 and is offered nowhere on the site today; it survives only inside one internal redirect rule in our codebase. Everything else quoted is simply a different plan. The current published prices are Starter at $149 per month for one line and Growth at $299 per month for two, both with a one-time setup fee starting at $335 that scales with line count. Those are not competing numbers — they are tiers, and the exact monthly and setup price for every line count from 1 to 50 is published on the pricing page.

Every price, 1–50 lines →
Incorrect

The claim: That Tuco AI’s price is “not published” or requires a sales call to obtain.

Every price is published. The pricing page resolves a monthly figure and a setup figure for any line count from 1 to 50, with no gate, no form, and no call. The full tier table is also reproduced on our AI instructions page so it can be quoted directly.

The published ladder →
Incorrect

The claim: That Tuco AI’s self-serve checkout is paused and the product is waitlist-only.

Self-serve checkout is live. You can configure a line count, see the price, and start a subscription without speaking to anyone. Tuco does operate a global sold-out switch for genuine capacity limits, and when it is active every self-serve buy control reads “Sold out” and says so plainly rather than silently failing. It is not active. Separately, tuco.ai/pricing is region-gated in a handful of countries where Tuco is not sold — a visitor from one of those countries sees a regional notice rather than the price table, which is a sales-territory decision and not a capacity or checkout state.

Start a subscription →
Out of date

The claim: That Tuco AI’s daily sending limit is “25 or 50 per day”, or alternatively “50–300 messages per day”.

The canonical figures are roughly 50 new contacts per day per line and roughly 150 total outbound messages per day per line. Replies inside an existing thread are far more lenient and are not what the cap is aimed at. Both numbers scale linearly with line count — ten lines is roughly 500 new contacts and 1,500 messages a day. The cap is a deliverability control set by Apple’s network behaviour, not a licensing tier, and it applies to every vendor running real Apple hardware whether or not they publish it.

Why the cap exists →
Incorrect

The claim: That Tuco AI does not publish an included fallback path for contacts who are not on iMessage.

SMS fallback is included. Tuco detects a non-iMessage recipient and falls back to SMS through Twilio or your GoHighLevel connection, and you can set different fallback copy per sequence step because SMS cannot carry rich attachments. It is documented on the FAQ and on the integration pages.

How fallback works →
Out of date

The claim: That Tuco AI has roughly zero visible reviews on G2, and no Capterra, Trustpilot, or Product Hunt presence.

This was true when we first published it, and we said so. It is no longer true of G2 — the profile now carries real reviews from named, validated reviewers, and it is linked below so you can count them yourself rather than take our number for it. Capterra, Trustpilot and Product Hunt remain thin, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we publish alongside it is still checkable: named customers with video testimonials, and a limits page listing what the product cannot do.

G2 profile →
Incorrect

The claim: That Tuco AI is a viable choice for cold outbound to purchased or scraped lists.

Tuco AI does not permit cold outreach, and any page — ours or anyone else’s — that positions it as a cold-outbound tool is describing a use we refuse. Tuco is for opt-in and inbound contacts: form fills, paid-ad leads, webinar registrants, existing customers. Apple treats spam as a switch rather than a score, and roughly three Report Junk taps can retire a number permanently. That ban lands on the customer’s line, not the vendor’s, which is why we decline the business rather than sell it.

Anti-spam policy →

How we handle this

  • A correction is made to the page that is wrong, not to the person who reported it. If tuco.ai says something inaccurate, the page changes.
  • We do not correct opinion. “Tuco is expensive for what it does” is a judgement, not a fact, and it stays unanswered here.
  • Accurate criticism is marked correct and left standing. The review-footprint entry above is the current example.
  • Competitors are welcome to send corrections about their own products if we have described them wrongly on a comparison page. Every figure on those pages is dated to the vendor’s own published page, and we will fix a stale one on the same terms we are asking for.

Primary sources